Fiscal Spending Jobs Multipliers: Evidence from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper estimates the “jobs multiplier” of fiscal spending using the state-level allocations of federal stimulus funds from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Specifically, I estimate the relationship between state-level federal ARRA spending and the change in states’ employment outcomes from the time the Act was passed (February 2009) to some later month (through June 2010). Because the allocation of stimulus spending across states may be endogenous with respect to state economic outcomes, I instrument for stimulus spending using exogenous formula-driven cost estimates made by the Wall Street Journal and the Center for American Progress around the time that the ARRA was passed. To control for the counterfactual – what would have happened without the stimulus – I include several variables likely to be strong predictors of state employment growth. The results point to substantial heterogeneity in the impact of ARRA spending over time, across sectors, and across types of spending. The estimated jobs multiplier for total nonfarm employment is large and statistically significant for ARRA spending through March 2010, but falls considerably and is statistically insignificant beyond March. The implied number of jobs created or saved by the spending is about 2.0 million as of March, but drops to 0.8 million as of June. Across sectors, the estimated impact of ARRA spending on construction employment is especially large, implying a 23% increase in employment (as of June 2010) relative to what it would have been without the ARRA. Lastly, I find that spending on infrastructure and other general purposes has a large positive impact, while aid to state government to support Medicaid may actually reduce state and local government employment.
منابع مشابه
Did the Stimulus Stimulate? Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
We use state and county level variation to examine the impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on employment. A cross state analysis suggests that one additional job was created by each $107,000 in stimulus spending. Time series analysis at the state level suggests a smaller response with a per job cost of about $400,000. These results imply Keynesian multipliers between 0.5 and 1....
متن کاملSome Fiscal Calculus
What is the impact of fiscal policy on the economy? How large are the “multipliers” of government spending and tax cuts? This old question has recently received considerable attention, in particular in the context of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. I contribute to answering that question by calculating fiscal multipliers in a baseline neoclassical growth model with en...
متن کاملDid the Stimulus Stimulate? Real Time Estimates of the Effects of the American Readjustment and Recovery Act
We use state and county level variation to examine the impact of the American Readjustment and Recovery Act on employment. A cross state analysis suggests that one additional job was created by each $170,000 in stimulus spending. Time series analysis at the state level suggests a smaller response with a per job cost of about $400,000. These results imply Keynesian multipliers between 0.5 and 1....
متن کاملThe Polarizing Effect of the Stimulus: Partisanship and Voter Responsiveness to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
We examine the effect of a sudden influx of government spending, the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), on support for the President’s party. Using a difference-indifferences design, we find that stimulus spending had a modest positive effect on Democratic vote share, but only in counties that were already Democratic-leaning. In Republican counties, by contrast, government spen...
متن کاملThe 2009 Recovery Act : Stimulus at the Extensive and Intensive Labor Margins ∗
This paper studies the effect of government stimulus spending on a novel aspect of the labor market: the differential impact of spending on the total wage bill versus employment. We analyze the 2009 Recovery Act via instrumental variables using a new instrument, the spending done by federal agencies that were not instructed to target funds towards harder hit regions. We find a moderate positive...
متن کامل